{"id":1031,"date":"2021-06-17T15:00:24","date_gmt":"2021-06-17T19:00:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/aafoa.org\/?post_type=articles&p=1031"},"modified":"2021-06-17T15:00:24","modified_gmt":"2021-06-17T19:00:24","slug":"coach-communication-done-well","status":"publish","type":"articles","link":"https:\/\/aafoa.org\/articles\/coach-communication-done-well\/","title":{"rendered":"Coach Communication Done Well"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"coach<\/p>\n

C<\/span>ommunication between officials and coaches is extremely important and is an essential element of a properly officiated game. Most coaches identify good communication as the single most important attribute of an official. There are limits, however. Being able to recognize when not to engag<\/a>e is as important as knowing what and when to have proper coach communications.<\/p>\n

Allowed<\/h2>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>The head coach is entitled\u00a0to an explanation<\/a> of all unusual rulings\u00a0or situations. The emphasis is that\u00a0communication is with the head coach\u00a0only. A timeout is not charged for\u00a0those types of discussions. Officials\u2019\u00a0timeouts to talk to coaches outside of\u00a0a coach-referee conference (NFHS 3-5-\u00a02c; NCAA 3-3-4e) should seldom be\u00a0allowed. The head coach may request\u00a0the conference at any time while the\u00a0ball is dead. The purpose of the rule is\u00a0to review a possible misapplication of\u00a0a rule by the officials, not to question\u00a0a judgment call, nor to express an\u00a0opinion on the quality of the calls. In\u00a0NCAA play, a challenge may also be\u00a0made if replay is available.<\/p>\n

Additionally, a head coach may\u00a0expect to have reasonable and brief\u00a0questions answered by the wing\u00a0official.<\/p>\n

The head coach is entitled to\u00a0the following information for all fouls:<\/p>\n